As one would expect from Liz, this is a valuable contribution to the debate, and very welcome. Without wishing to denigrate what the Society is attempting to achieve, I find it concerning and confusing that under their FAQ section they make it clear that women cannot be BHS members; "inclusive" must have a different definition in the USA.
As one would expect from Liz, this is a valuable contribution to the debate, and very welcome. Without wishing to denigrate what the Society is attempting to achieve, I find it concerning and confusing that under their FAQ section they make it clear that women cannot be BHS members; "inclusive" must have a different definition in the USA.